Liao Dongqing designed bar / Taiwan and China does not have a "state-to-state" relationship? (To celebrate the Republic of China "subjugation" 101-year series of 71)
Wu Poh-hsiung in the year (31 July 2012), led a delegation to China to attend the 8th of cross-strait trade and cultural forum between the country say the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference Chairman Jia Qinglin thrown in his speech, clear that the two sides belong to one China, speak more clearly the world is "cross-strait relations is not state-to-state relations", and can not recognize the country of the two sides, one country refers to the Republic of China, especially in China does not like one of the table, because it makes the world mistakenly thought the two absurd error like India, China is also thought as long as the sojourn of the Republic of China in Taiwan acknowledges sides belong to one country, is an indirect recognition of the status of the Government of the Republic of China, no longer sit equal level with the Chinese state-to-state relationship become a province of China, coupled with China in the international 41 years since spared no effort to advocacy with Taiwan is an inalienable part of Chinese since ancient times part of the propaganda.
Next signed a "cross-strait peace agreement" and Ma Ying-jeou, As for the follow-up to the receiver Taiwan, China may intend had appealed to the international court will come up with the elected leaders of the Republic of China, Ma Ying-jeou autographed cross-strait peace agreement, asked the international court to recognize the legality and legitimacy of this cross-strait peace agreement, Taiwan really will become a part of China.? Things do not like to think so smooth As for the United Nations, China is not brave enough to have any requirements in the United Nations as early as in 1971, China has just joined the United Nations, asked the United Nations Secretariat, to the world notice, Taiwan China's part? The Secretariat asked the Chinese to come up with proof of Taiwan's sovereignty, just take out China's request, the Secretariat will be according to the resolution, from 1971 to 2012 this year, 41 years, "China" still remain unable to get out "has" proof of Taiwan's sovereignty out!
Even if China had appealed to the international court, while trying to evade United Nations, the International Tribunal will not be biased in favor of any party, of course, will not let the party said the job done, this is a must bring it to draw the physical evidence and witnesses to the last international court will want to come up with "out with" proof of Taiwan's sovereignty, surest exhibits outside, in addition to the cross-strait peace agreement signed and Ma Ying-jeou, the other is the Cairo Declaration, a Cairo Declaration is the president of the Chiang Kai unilaterally the instruments from a text of the draft statement, Chiang Kai-shek multiply summit meeting in Cairo, Egypt, America, Britain, Chiang Kai-shek suddenly come up with this "Cairo Declaration", the U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, the two To the United States and Britain after the end of the war, Taiwan and the Penghu Islands and China's three northeastern provinces, to the Republic of China sign.
President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill, refused to signed the Cairo Declaration on Prime Minister Churchill, Chiang Kai-shek was also rebuked the meal after the two sessions of the United States Senate and members of Congress, U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt in order to sign the Cairo Declaration on must-thirds 2 or more consent to it, because the Senate and two sessions on behalf of the American people, and Congress agreed to let the U.S. presidential signature, but also on behalf of this and about the endorsement of the American people in the back, if signed under President Franklin D. Roosevelt If the altar of selfish, Congress must President Franklin D. Roosevelt's responsibility will be investigated, the charges are quite serious, at least the charges of "treason", the United States and Britain in the leaders of the three countries signed the Cairo Declaration on, this is not called the Cairo Declaration, but should be called the Cairo treaty treaty with the international legitimacy and the legitimacy of the legal Declaration it? No legal validity and legitimacy but also illegal!
Proof of Taiwan's "sovereignty" in the end is that a country has? Republic of China? Or Japan? Republic of China in 1949 had toward the national perdition! In 1952, the Republic of China in Taiwan Taipei Guest House and the representative of Japan, signed the so-called Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty, the KMT's argument is that Japan signed this "Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty, Japan sovereignty of Taiwan and the Penghu Islands, be returned to China Republic of China, but the Japanese government immediately jump out to clarify that, and the Republic of China signed the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty, not the sovereignty of Taiwan and the Penghu Islands to the contents of the Republic of China, regardless of the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty or the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty now becomes respective interpretations! Republic of China in 1952, had not the facts of the countries, the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty signed between the Government of Japan and the Republic of China, and no legal legitimacy and legality of! Although it possession of a permanent member of the seats in the United Nations, but are illegally occupied, in the 19 years after 1971, the KMT government, or be expelled from the United Nations!
Sign in the 1951 U.S. Army 4 arms (land, sea, and land and sea) forces, comprehensive stationed in Taiwan and the Penghu Islands, the second year under the auspices of the United States, Japan, the official representative of the city of San Francisco in Northern California, in the San Francisco Peace Treaty " "give up" all the "sovereignty of Taiwan and the Penghu Islands, which also represents Since then, Taiwan and Japan from this without any relationship! Taiwan is forever and will not be returned to Japan, unless the US-Japanese war, Japan to win the U.S. Otherwise, Japan is not likely to re-Taiwan has! The United States on the San Francisco Peace Treaty stated very clearly, is to Japan renounces everything, including "sovereignty"! Not included sovereignty, the U.S. military in World War 2, 550,000 U.S. troops killed in action, would not have died in vain out! Some adhere only to abandon Taiwan, Japan without talking to whom? San Francisco Peace Treaty, enacted by the United States to Japan to give up, followed by the United States to receive! Ma Ying-jeou, it has been quite clear, well aware, the Republic of China does not have the sovereignty of Taiwan and the Penghu Islands, this Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty KMT in Taiwan brought Pianchipianhe to deceive the people of Taiwan, Ma Ying-jeou dare the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty, there are Chinese dare the Cairo Declaration to get the International Tribunal and the Treaty of San Francisco to a comparison? 'll Eluded capture public effectiveness and legitimacy of international law, only the San Francisco Peace Treaty is! (0018)
http://tw01.org/profiles/blogs/101-71
(The Liaodong Qing / political commentator in North America)) (Welcome posted / Forward / download)
廖東慶專攔/台灣和中國沒有「國與國」的關係嗎？(慶祝中華民國「亡國」101年系列71)
吳伯雄在(7月31日2012)年，率團到中國參加第8屆兩岸經貿文化論壇，中國政協主席賈慶林在致詞時拋出兩岸一國的說法，更明確的說就是兩岸同 屬一個中國，再說清楚一點就是「兩岸關係不是國與國的關係」，中國也不可能承認兩岸一國的國就是指中華民國，尤其中國更不喜歡一中各表，因為這會讓全世界 誤以為世界上有兩個中國的荒謬錯誤印像，中國還以為只要在台灣寄居的中華民國承認兩岸同屬一國的話，就是間接承認中華民國政府的地位，不再是與中國平等平 坐的國與國的關係，而變成是中國其中一個省份，再加上中國在國際上41年以來不遺餘力的宣導著，台灣自古以來就是中國不可分割的一部份宣導。
接下來再和馬英九簽署「兩岸和平協議書」，至於後續該如何接收台灣，可能中國打算上告國際法庭，也會拿出中華民國的民選領導人馬英九親筆簽名的兩岸 和平協議書，要求國際法庭承認這份兩岸和平協議書的合法性及正當性，台灣真的會因此而變成中國的一部份嗎？事情並不會像中國所想的那麼一帆風順，至於聯合 國方面，中國也不敢向聯合國有任何的要求，因為早在1971年中國剛加入聯合國，就要求聯合國秘書處，向全世界通告，台灣是中國的一部份？秘書處要求中國 拿出擁有台灣主權的證明出來，只要拿得出來，中國的要求，秘書處一定會照辨，從1971年到今年2012年為止，41年了，「中國」至今還是無法拿得出來 「擁有」台灣主權的證明出來！
就算中國上告國際法庭，而故意迴避聯合國，國際法庭也並不會偏袒任何一方，當然也不會任由一方說了就算，這是一定要拿得出物證及人證才行，到最後國 際法庭也會要中國拿出「擁有」台灣主權的證明出來，中國最有把握的證物，除了是和馬英九簽署的兩岸和平協議書之外，另外就是開羅宣言了，這一份開羅宣言是 前蔣介石總統單方面所擬稿而成的一份文字聲明文書，蔣介石乘美英中三國首腦在埃及開羅開會的時候，蔣介石突然拿出這份「開羅宣言」出來，要美國總統小羅斯 福及英國首相邱吉爾，兩人在上面簽名，要美英兩國在戰爭結束之後，將台灣及澎湖群島和中國東北三省，交給中華民國。
小羅斯福總統及邱吉爾首相，拒絕在開羅宣言上簽名，蔣介石還被邱吉爾首相斥責一頓，如果美國總統小羅斯福要想在開羅宣言上簽字的話，一定要經過美國 參眾兩會的國會議員3分之2以上同意才行，因為參眾兩會是代表美國人民，而且國會同意讓美國總統簽名，也是代表這份和約有美國人民在後面背書，如果小羅斯 福總統要是壇自私下簽名的話，美國國會一定會追究小羅斯福總統的責任，這個罪名相當嚴重，至少是「叛國罪」的罪名，美英中3國領導人如果在開羅宣言上簽名 的話，這就不是叫做開羅宣言，而應該是叫做開羅條約，因為條約是具有國際法律上的正當性及合法性！宣言呢？沒有法律上的效力及正當性而且還是非法的！
到底是那一個國家擁有台灣「主權」的證明？是中華民國嗎？還是日本嗎？中華民國在1949年就己經亡國亡朝了！在1952中華民國在台灣台北賓館和 日本代表，簽下所謂的中日和約，國民黨的說法是日本簽下這份「中日和約」是表示日本把台灣及澎湖群島的主權，歸還給中華民國，但是日本政府立即跳出來澄清 說，和中華民國所簽的日中和約，並沒有把台灣及澎湖群島的主權交給中華民國的內容，不管是中日和約還是日中和約，現在是變成了各自表述了！在1952年的 中華民國就己經不是個國家的事實了，所以日本政府和中華民國之間所簽署的日中和約，並沒有法律上的正當性及合法性！雖然它在聯合國還佔有一個永久理事國的 席位，但那是屬於非法佔據，在19年之後的1971年，國民黨政府還是被趕出聯合國！
在1951年美國3軍4兵種(陸海空及海陸) 部隊，全面進駐台灣及澎湖群島，第二年在美國的主導下，日本官方代表在美國北加州的舊金山市，在「舊金山和約」上簽名，「放棄」所有對台灣及澎湖群島的 「主權」，這也代表從此以後，台灣和日本從此沒有任何的關係！台灣是永永遠遠也不會再交還給日本，除非美日開戰，日本打贏了美國，否則日本是不可能會再擁 有台灣！美國在「舊金山和約」上註明非常清楚，就是要日本放棄台灣所有一切，包括「主權」在內！如果沒有把主權包括在內的話，美軍在第2次世界大戰中，戰 死的55萬名美軍，豈不是都白白犧牲掉了嗎！有人堅持日本只有放棄台灣，而沒有說要交給誰？舊金山和約是美國制定的，要日本放棄，接著就是由美國來接收台 灣！這一點己經是相當清楚了，馬英九也心知肚明，中華民國並沒有擁有台灣及澎湖群島的主權，這份中日和約是國民黨在台灣拿來騙吃騙喝，欺騙台灣人民，馬英 九敢不敢把中日和約，還有中國敢不敢把開羅宣言拿到國際法庭來和舊金山條約來比一比？馬上就會露出馬腳，也只有舊金山和約才是具有國際法的公效力及正當 性！(0018)
http://tw01.org/profiles/blogs/101-71
(廖東慶/北美政治評論家) ) (歡迎轉貼/轉寄/下載)
罷免馬英九 2013/05/20http://www.facebook.com/ Mei Feng Chang
乍ㄢ的拉
